Monday, November 1, 2010

Pinch Pleated Curtains, Drawstring

A definitive conclusion on the Daddy

One thing should serve the use of clichés in the language. That youth is "not" are "criminals" that "there are no values," before "did not fit any of my school" in order "everything was better." The same thing I heard while I was in high school and starting my college life. Like our elders listened to their elders.

The last episode cause these expressions has been the student protest last week demanding the universal scholarship promoted the current government. In no way am I defending what seems to me excessive. Nor will I condemn the perpetrators, much less in general terms: the widespread habit of generalizing inevitably leads to errors.

Rather than explaining my reasons, I propose a few questions about it:
What can
require a company to its members, not previously provided to you?, for example, what patterns, what are the examples we get a young, so it can be condemned to repeat in your living space that is socially normal ?, is the demand made on the protest is another manifestation of paternalistic, clientelistic relations that underlie our political system seen in public administration from the master-candidate-bases in political parties, the Executive-Legislative-companies-public office?, are they not socially dominant values \u200b\u200bwhich will be more easily performed?, do they arise young people, with all the negative charge attributed to them, out of nowhere, or awareness and behavior is the product of social relations?

so far say that can justify what happened and begs the question: does it fail to react in the opposite direction, ie, rejecting the bad practices?, Of course, so why not?, Who said they do not?, could it be that less made visible and very little support those who do or want to?, do not facilitate this reaction the existence of youth organizations, youth, independent of any nature and objectives?, from later. Where

is the source of corruption in the student movement, once the vanguard of political and social struggle for the improvement of the identity, integrity, freedom and dignity of our country, "where is the origin of the prohibition or the introduction of obstacles secondary education for ideological debate among young people, a tool that prosecutes its rebellion against the imagination of potential companies and their links with policy initiatives in this direction, as befits a truly democratic society?, where is the origin of mediocrity and double standards in the university space, but kidnapping is suffering the Public university by "authorities" and estates that ignore the fundamental role of the institution in national life in return for perks?

Who benefits from the lack of questioning about the deep social problems that can make a commitment to youth without its own ideal of the future, who benefits a human being incomplete and subject to the provisions?, Who benefits the image associated with youth with criminal activities, hiding from the hands of justice and the front pages of the media at large white collar crime that creates the conditions in which youth live?, who benefit invest in repression and prisons instead of investing in culture, education, health and sports as instruments of human security policy in the short, medium and long term?, who benefit not invest in educating the whole man, who holds in power, who benefits hinder access to knowledge and tools of development?, who benefits from the weakness in the prospects for social transformation and resignation at having to "adapt", "mature", because "things are and always have been so? " Issue

trial or comment on what happened involves considering a number of variables is not question of tearing his hair only. Young people younger than they have been interested to read these lines: we know they have the ability to think for yourselves, the vital obligation to aspire to better times and the right to convert this aspiration into reality. Do not be persuaded, not getting carried away, do not be surprised repeating commonplace within a few years.

One thing should serve the common places in politics. Another politics is possible.



0 comments:

Post a Comment