Sample Car Insurance Certificate

of a conversation on ways to fight

in response to a question from a friend, share these ideas ...

struggle:

1. Opposition, rivalry or hostility between opponents who try to impose on each other.

2. effort is made to withstand a hostile force or temptation, to survive or to achieve some goal.

Pacific:

1. adj. Quiet, quiet, does not cause strife or discord.

2. adj. in peace, undisturbed by wars or riots.

3. adj. What is or is not opposition, contradiction or change in your state.

live in a society divided into classes, increasingly polarized and antagonistic to their interests. The conflict inherent in such a social form has been and is permanent, but tends to sharpen the contradictions are more apparent.

The struggle to overcome such conditions was consistent with periods of more or less external violence where the prevailing theory or action, although both are always present and depend on each other.

More than peaceful struggle, knowing the violent nature of power in place, would struggle through peaceful means, by the oppressed (eg Gandhi) but fight to the end. And struggles through violent means (eg, Guevara), on behalf of the oppressed, when the violence of the oppressors in their resistance to change leads society to open conforntación.

In order that the fight there, says real conflicts contradictory product of a society, just changing (and complement) the means of struggle, both legitimate and necessary as are the equally legitimate needs of those who invoke and practice, as is violence / resistance of the establishment.

say that there peaceful struggle, but struggle by peaceful means, on our part. For the contrary, which imposes violence in the system, you can not talk peace.

What we can not do is go to the fight foolishly Front material disadvantage and / or intellectual. What we must fight for all viable and necessary manpower accumulating conscious, intellectual scientist wins in front of the power lies in the physical and material.

I think the fight begins by arming yourself in the head but unfortunately ends up in arms, must be responsible and constantly go step by step to the end, for which I consider vital to there is sufficient fund to support a costly victory in terms of human lives.

irresponsible therefore consider the immediate, violent opportunism closure does not add nor people, nor victories intellectual or material, and only serves to release hormones, if those individuals do not engage in an ongoing effort individually and together to communities.

known that I do not rule out the method, while I was there, somehow I will be playing to be there again, but honestly is not sufficient per se productive for our struggle in the current conditions.

is also fucking the exquisite intellectual disgust have to sweat in the march, get your hands dirty with the earth and drop a shot on necessary; as stubborn as believed to help the people releasing their stress, no effort to construct alternatives by 'sweating' the brain. So to be there unfortunately, because it is 'just and necessary', and knowing that no one is assured to get a taste of the day of victory when he gets into this, so I do the work I do.

I leave you with a code of ethics very short, comprehensive and fundamental

My kids

Dear Hildita, Aleidita, Camilo, Celia and Ernesto:

If you ever have to read this letter, it is because I am not among you

Almost no remember me and the little ones will not remember anything.

His father was a man who thinks and acts as has certainly been true to their convictions.

Grow up as good revolutionaries. Study hard to master the technique to master nature. Remember that the revolution is important and that each of us, alone, is worth nothing. Especially are always capable of feeling deeply any injustice committed against anyone anywhere in the world. is the most beautiful quality of a revolutionary.

Farewell my children, I hope to see yet. A big kiss and a hug from

Dad

Emerald Candied Wa;nuts

a conversation about the electoral system Panamanian

... But the point is that at this time the electoral law does not allow independent presidential bid, breaking the constitution. participation conditions are unfair to those who dominate the structure and for those seeking alternatives, deeper reforms or changes. Example of this public funds are allocated to the parties and the difference between the power conferred on the citizen to simply switch between parties with a firm, not as easily allowed to support independent applications, or the formation of new parties. I believe that this situation taught as close to reality, the idea that there is no danger in the alternation in government and in the share of adherents among the existing parties, all of which respond to real factors of power [ traditional economic ] . The "problem" is then to enable real choices and so seek not allow them.

For the formation of political parties, national mandatory, sets out a number of requirements as the number and geographical distribution of the possible accession to the task extremely difficult. Since then, the creation of obstacles by the dominant sectors is not something that Panama is a source of complaint but not crying, it is simply a reality that is facing the construction processes of political forces within the limited framework, tailored and always exceeds the law.

Speaking of status quo-which incidentally has the bad habit and profitable dress of progressive, tolerant, democratic, pluralist illustrated and then argues that if you do not have the "capacity" to strengthen the alternative project in accordance with legal requirements and means "democratic" because it shows how impractical or unnecessary project "does not correspond to an aspiration of society."

This claim might have some validity to a certain point, but we can not forget is that material reality is superior to law, our political parties are still capitalizing on the poor living conditions of most Panamanians, ie that the political system is living on clientelism, a situation quite compatible with a state that is based on the practice of corruption in its various forms as a means of subsistence and reproduction, learned from the days of the "conquest" English, until time, through our "independence" our "separation" and our "process", which set deep dependency relations between socio-economic power that has established practice, the party or candidate and the elector of a keen client "resolves ".

access to government is the strength of our existing parties, is a way to defend those who set up and make 5 years of prosperity with a change in power that simulates a democratic state and maintains a balance perverse and increasingly untenable.

Regardless of statements, programs, plans (if any), they are not specified in a government practice in line with its declared ideology, or more evidence in public policy dispute between a and the other party. Our people mostly do not have deep ideological definitions, the numbers of members who boast of our games are nothing more than reflection, there are exceptions, of espitirual and material misery of much of our population, the necessity of living human beings irrespective of the environment in which it was born, and the enthronement in the collective consciousness of our most deeply rooted conception the world: play our daily living.